nl There is also a DUTCH VERSION of this site

Google

More articles

01 Feb - 28 Feb 2010
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2010
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2009
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2009
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2009
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2009
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2009
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2009
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2009
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2009
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2008
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2008
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2008
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2008
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2008
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2008
01 May - 31 May 2008
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2008
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2008
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2008
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2008
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2007
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2007
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2007
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2007
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2007
01 Jul - 31 Jul 2007
01 Jun - 30 Jun 2007
01 May - 31 May 2007
01 Apr - 30 Apr 2007
01 Mar - 31 Mar 2007
01 Feb - 28 Feb 2007
01 Jan - 31 Jan 2007
01 Dec - 31 Dec 2006
01 Nov - 30 Nov 2006
01 Oct - 31 Oct 2006
01 Sep - 30 Sep 2006
01 Aug - 31 Aug 2006


Links

Deze site wordt gehost bij
ATN-Networks

Aanbevolen
Genootschap voor Informatie Architecten
Rene Hamberg
Bas Varkevisser
Ruth Malan
l-rs.org
Informatiekundig bekeken
Bredemeyer Consulting
Gaudi site
Hans Bot ArchITectuur Bedrijven
Security.nl

Nick Malik
Leo de Sousa



Misc

Powered by Pivot - 1.40.1: 'Dreadwind' 
XML: RSS Feed 
XML: Atom Feed 

Technorati Profile

Hardeningscheck and hack testing for new servers

11 April 08 - 14:32
Area: default - Link to this article

For a client I work for, it is normal procedure to do a security check before servers go into production. This is not obvious for most organisations though.

In the years I spent at various organisations I have never found a situation before where it was policy to do a hardeningscheck and/or a hack test for every single new server that is to be placed in production.

The hardening check consists of checking if various services or daemons are switched off, IPSec is used, no default login accounts are used, a host-based firewall is used, all patches are applied, etc. This is a check on the "inside" of a system.

The hacktest will check the outside. What TCP/UDP ports are open, is the system vulnerable to SQL-injection or cross-site scripting, etc.

These tests should not done by system administrators, but by security professionals (preferably from an external company). The results should be documented in a report with non-compliances and tips. Systems are only allowed in production after these checks are done. This is done for every single system.

If changes are made to the systems, the tests must be repeated.

A risk analysis should be part of the process.

I think more companies should implement this strategy. It takes time, slows down implementations, and costs money. I know. But systems usually will be in production for many years. Making sure the system has a secure start is the least one can do.


More articles: See left pane.

About Sjaak Laan

Sjaak Laan

I am 45 years old and married with Angelina. We have 3 children of 11, 6 and 4 years old. We live in The Netherlands, in a place called Drachten

I work for Logica as Principal IT Architect. I have 20 years IT experience.

I own the following certificates:

itac_l Master Certified IT Architect



CISSP_logo CISSP (Certified Information Systems Security Professional)



TOGAF8_Certified_web TOGAF Certified Architect


I am a member of the:


I manage my business contacts using Linkedin.


I can be reached through sjaak.laan@gmail.com.

This site states my opinion only, and not nessecarily the opinion of my employer or of the clients I work for.